(LMSLFD1818754)
LAWMAN Times is a medium of legal news update, legal awareness and social news portal under the aegis of Lawman Associate Services (Legal & Management Consultants). Registered under MSME Udyam (Govt. of India)
Sunday, August 22, 2021
Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction -Bombay High Court
Specific Relief Act, 1963 Sections 34 and 38 Suit for declaration of title and injunction - Plaintiff contended that he purchased suit property by way of sale - Defendants without any right issued notice to remove the encroachment - Therefore, suit filed for declaration of his title and injunction against defendants restraining them from disturbing his possession - Earlier, suit for declaration of ownership and injunction filed by vendor of plaintiff was dismissed as vendor failed to prove his ownership over plots in question - Vendor of plaintiff had no any title to sale the plots in question - Therefore plaintiff could not claim title by virtue of sale deeds executed by his vendor - Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Transfer of Petition-- Matrimonial Suit -- Wife Living Far Away with Minor Child -- Suit transferred to court near residence of wife
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, S.24 -- Transfer of Matrimonial Suit -- Wife Living Far Away with Minor Child -- Suit can be tran...
-
जनहित याचिका या पब्लिक इंटरेस्ट लिटिगेशन (PIL) भारत में एक अनोखा कानूनी तरीका है जो किसी भी नागरिक या संगठन को उन लोगों की ओर से...
-
इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने कहा है कि उत्तर प्रदेश में निजी संपत्ति के भीतर धार्मिक प्रार्थना सभा आयोजित करने के लिए किसी तरह की अनुमति...
-
छत्तीसगढ़ उच्च न्यायालय ने यह माना है कि भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 की धारा 90 के तहत तीस वर्ष पुराने दस्तावेजों को प्राप्त वै...
No comments:
Post a Comment