(LMSLFD1818754)
LAWMAN Times is a medium of legal news update, legal awareness and social news portal under the aegis of Lawman Associate Services (Legal & Management Consultants). Registered under MSME Udyam (Govt. of India)
Sunday, August 22, 2021
Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction -Bombay High Court
Specific Relief Act, 1963 Sections 34 and 38 Suit for declaration of title and injunction - Plaintiff contended that he purchased suit property by way of sale - Defendants without any right issued notice to remove the encroachment - Therefore, suit filed for declaration of his title and injunction against defendants restraining them from disturbing his possession - Earlier, suit for declaration of ownership and injunction filed by vendor of plaintiff was dismissed as vendor failed to prove his ownership over plots in question - Vendor of plaintiff had no any title to sale the plots in question - Therefore plaintiff could not claim title by virtue of sale deeds executed by his vendor - Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने एक आरोपी की जमानत याचिका पर विचार करते हुए आर्य समाज द्वारा जारी एक विवाह प्रमाण पत्र को स्वीकार करने से इनकार ...
-
आज प्रदेश के अधिवक्ताओं की समस्याओं को लेकर माननीय चेयरमैन बार काउंसिल श्री मधुसूदन त्रिपाठी जी के साथ माननीय मुख्यमंत्री महोदय ...
-
संभल-जिला उपभोक्ता आयोग संभल ने आयोग के आदेश का अनुपालन न करने पर उत्तर प्रदेश पावर कारपोरेशन के अध्यक्ष व चंदौसी खंड के अधिशास...
No comments:
Post a Comment