(LMSLFD1818754)
LAWMAN Times is a medium of legal news update, legal awareness and social news portal under the aegis of Lawman Associate Services (Legal & Management Consultants). Registered under MSME Udyam (Govt. of India)
Sunday, August 22, 2021
Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction -Bombay High Court
Specific Relief Act, 1963 Sections 34 and 38 Suit for declaration of title and injunction - Plaintiff contended that he purchased suit property by way of sale - Defendants without any right issued notice to remove the encroachment - Therefore, suit filed for declaration of his title and injunction against defendants restraining them from disturbing his possession - Earlier, suit for declaration of ownership and injunction filed by vendor of plaintiff was dismissed as vendor failed to prove his ownership over plots in question - Vendor of plaintiff had no any title to sale the plots in question - Therefore plaintiff could not claim title by virtue of sale deeds executed by his vendor - Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Provisio of 223 of BNSS is Mandatory
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 223 and Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 - Complaint under Section 138 of NI Ac...
-
संपत्ति सुरक्षा के लिए अस्थाई निषेधाज्ञा एक सिविल उपचार-अधिवक्ता परिषद ब्रज का स्वाध्याय मंडल आयोजितअधिवक्ता परिषद ब्रज जनपद इकाई सम्भल के स्वाध्याय मंडल की बैठक दिनांक 19/07/2025 एडवोकेट अजीत सिंह स्मृति भवन बार रूम सभागार चंदौ...
-
बहजोई निवासी ममता देवी के पति ने एक्सिस बैंक से अपने व्यापार करने के लिए ऋण लिया था जिसकी सुरक्षा हेतु बैंक ने मैक्स लाइफ इंश्यो...
-
कर्नाटक में भाजपा कार्यकर्ता योगेश गौड़ा की हत्या के मामले में गवाहों को प्रभावित करने पर कांग्रेस विधायक और पूर्व मंत्री विनय कुलकर्णी की ज...
No comments:
Post a Comment