(LMSLFD1818754)
LAWMAN Times is a medium of legal news update, legal awareness and social news portal under the aegis of Lawman Associate Services (Legal & Management Consultants). Registered under MSME Udyam (Govt. of India)
Sunday, August 22, 2021
Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction -Bombay High Court
Specific Relief Act, 1963 Sections 34 and 38 Suit for declaration of title and injunction - Plaintiff contended that he purchased suit property by way of sale - Defendants without any right issued notice to remove the encroachment - Therefore, suit filed for declaration of his title and injunction against defendants restraining them from disturbing his possession - Earlier, suit for declaration of ownership and injunction filed by vendor of plaintiff was dismissed as vendor failed to prove his ownership over plots in question - Vendor of plaintiff had no any title to sale the plots in question - Therefore plaintiff could not claim title by virtue of sale deeds executed by his vendor - Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
गवाहों को प्रभावित करने पर पूर्व मंत्री विनय कुलकर्णी की जमानत निरस्त
कर्नाटक में भाजपा कार्यकर्ता योगेश गौड़ा की हत्या के मामले में गवाहों को प्रभावित करने पर कांग्रेस विधायक और पूर्व मंत्री विनय कुलकर्णी की ज...
-
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने एक आरोपी की जमानत याचिका पर विचार करते हुए आर्य समाज द्वारा जारी एक विवाह प्रमाण पत्र को स्वीकार करने से इनकार ...
-
संभल-जिला उपभोक्ता आयोग संभल ने आयोग के आदेश का अनुपालन न करने पर उत्तर प्रदेश पावर कारपोरेशन के अध्यक्ष व चंदौसी खंड के अधिशास...
-
आज प्रदेश के अधिवक्ताओं की समस्याओं को लेकर माननीय चेयरमैन बार काउंसिल श्री मधुसूदन त्रिपाठी जी के साथ माननीय मुख्यमंत्री महोदय ...
No comments:
Post a Comment