(LMSLFD1818754)
LAWMAN Times is a medium of legal news update, legal awareness and social news portal under the aegis of Lawman Associate Services (Legal & Management Consultants). Registered under MSME Udyam (Govt. of India)
Sunday, August 22, 2021
Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction -Bombay High Court
Specific Relief Act, 1963 Sections 34 and 38 Suit for declaration of title and injunction - Plaintiff contended that he purchased suit property by way of sale - Defendants without any right issued notice to remove the encroachment - Therefore, suit filed for declaration of his title and injunction against defendants restraining them from disturbing his possession - Earlier, suit for declaration of ownership and injunction filed by vendor of plaintiff was dismissed as vendor failed to prove his ownership over plots in question - Vendor of plaintiff had no any title to sale the plots in question - Therefore plaintiff could not claim title by virtue of sale deeds executed by his vendor - Plaintiff had not examined the vendor - Plaintiff filed to establish his ownership - Not entitled to declaration and injunction.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
मतांतरण किए बिना किया गया विवाह अवैध- इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट
इलाहाबाद हाई कोर्ट ने एक महत्वपूर्ण टिप्पणी में कहा कि मतांतरण किए बिना विपरीत धर्म के जोड़ों की शादी अवैध है। कोर्ट ने गृह सचिव...
-
आंध्र प्रदेश उच्च न्यायालय ने निर्णय दिया है कि परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम की धारा 138 के तहत आपराधिक मामले से संबंधित लोक अदालत द्वारा पारित पु...
No comments:
Post a Comment